The upcoming hard fork in the Bitcoin Cash (BCH) network has sparked intense debate and speculation across the cryptocurrency community. With two competing implementations—Bitcoin Cash ABC and Bitcoin Cash SV—vying for dominance, the blockchain world is bracing for a potential hashing war, ideological split, and market volatility. This article dives deep into the technical, economic, and social dynamics shaping this critical moment in BCH’s evolution.
Understanding the Bitcoin Cash Hard Fork
Bitcoin Cash is scheduled for a hard fork on November 15, a pre-planned upgrade that could result in a permanent split in the blockchain. Unlike soft forks, which maintain backward compatibility, hard forks require all nodes and miners to upgrade to the new protocol rules—otherwise, they risk operating on a divergent chain.
Currently, two primary implementations are at odds:
- Bitcoin Cash ABC (Adjustable Blocksize Cap) – backed by major players like Bitmain and Bitcoin.com.
- Bitcoin Cash SV (Satoshi Vision) – led by Dr. Craig Wright and supported by entrepreneur Calvin Ayre.
While both claim to uphold the original vision of peer-to-peer electronic cash, their technical approaches and long-term philosophies differ significantly.
Bitcoin Cash ABC: The Community-Focused Roadmap
Bitcoin Cash ABC is the dominant node implementation on the BCH network. According to blockchain analytics platform coin.dance, 98% of surveyed companies support or are prepared for the Bitcoin ABC roadmap. However, when adjusting for company influence and web presence—where giants like Coinbase and Binance carry heavier weight—the support drops to around 62%.
👉 Discover how blockchain networks evolve during contentious upgrades.
Despite this adjustment, ABC maintains strong backing from key infrastructure providers, exchanges, and developers who favor iterative improvements, including replay protection, canonical transaction ordering, and smart contract enhancements via the Schnorr signatures and CTOR updates.
The ABC team emphasizes decentralization, developer autonomy, and community governance—principles that align with broader crypto ethos.
Bitcoin Cash SV: Returning to ‘Satoshi’s Original Vision’
On the opposing side, Bitcoin Cash SV (Satoshi Vision) aims to restore what its proponents believe is the true design of Bitcoin as envisioned by Satoshi Nakamoto. Led by controversial figure Dr. Craig Wright, SV advocates for massive block sizes—up to 128MB or more—to enable high-throughput transaction processing and enterprise-level use cases.
SV rejects many modern protocol upgrades introduced in ABC, arguing they deviate from Satoshi’s whitepaper. Instead, it prioritizes stability, large-scale mining operations, and on-chain data storage capabilities.
Supporters include Calvin Ayre’s mining pool and investment arm, which has publicly committed hash power to defend the SV chain post-fork. This backing raises concerns about a potential hashing war, where competing miners expend vast resources to assert dominance over the legitimate BCH chain.
Network Nodes and Hash Rate Distribution
As of current data from coin.dance, over 2,000 active nodes are running the Bitcoin Cash protocol. The majority operate on either Bitcoin ABC or Bitcoin Unlimited. However, a growing number—approximately 135 nodes—are now running Bitcoin SV software, with that figure rising steadily in the weeks leading up to the fork.
Node distribution is a key indicator of network resilience and decentralization. While ABC still leads in node count, SV’s rapid adoption among certain mining pools suggests concentrated but powerful support.
Hash rate distribution will ultimately determine which chain survives if both persist after the fork. Miners will likely follow profitability, but ideological alignment may also play a role—especially given the high-profile endorsements from figures like Wright and Ayre.
Market Sentiment and Futures Trading
Market signals offer early insight into likely outcomes. Poloniex, a crypto exchange backed by Circle, launched futures trading for both forked assets ahead of the event—a move that allows investors to bet on post-fork valuations.
At the time of writing:
- BCH (legacy) trades at $595
- BCH-ABC futures at $520
- BCH-SV futures at $80
This pricing reflects a stark market preference: approximately 85% of trading volume favors ABC, while only 15% backs SV. Although not definitive, these ratios suggest limited confidence in SV’s long-term viability among traders and institutions.
👉 See how futures markets predict blockchain splits.
Importantly, these markets assume a successful fork. If consensus remains unified or if SV fails to gain traction, these derivatives may settle at zero value.
Could There Be a Hashing War?
A hashing war occurs when two factions deploy competing mining power to extend their version of the blockchain, attempting to reorganize or overwrite the other chain. Such conflicts can lead to double-spending attacks, exchange suspensions, and prolonged network instability.
There are growing concerns that Jihan Wu of Bitmain could redirect some of his SHA-256 mining operations—from Bitcoin (BTC) to BCH-ABC—to secure the chain covertly. This kind of strategic maneuver could deter SV from gaining sufficient confirmation depth, effectively sidelining it without an overt public campaign.
However, Calvin Ayre’s deep pockets and control over substantial mining resources mean SV won’t back down easily. A prolonged conflict could drain millions in electricity and hardware costs—with no clear winner.
Industry Reactions: From V神 to Exchange Policies
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has publicly welcomed the potential exit of Craig Wright from the broader Bitcoin ecosystem, calling it a “healthy purge” for the community. He criticized Wright’s claims of being Satoshi Nakamoto as unfounded and damaging to trust in decentralized systems.
Wright responded aggressively during a recent crypto conference in Korea, labeling Buterin a fraud—an exchange that further polarized opinions.
Meanwhile, exchanges are taking cautious stances. Some have announced support for both chains temporarily; others wait to see which version demonstrates stronger hash power and community adoption before listing either token.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is the difference between Bitcoin Cash ABC and Bitcoin Cash SV?
Bitcoin Cash ABC focuses on gradual upgrades like smart contracts and transaction efficiency, while Bitcoin Cash SV aims to maximize block size and return to what it views as Satoshi’s original blueprint—rejecting many modern protocol changes.
Will I get free coins if the fork happens?
If you held BCH in a personal wallet before the fork, you would likely own equal amounts on both chains afterward—provided you control your private keys. However, exchanges may delay distribution or choose not to support one chain.
Which chain is more likely to survive?
Based on current node distribution, developer activity, and market pricing, Bitcoin Cash ABC appears better positioned for long-term survival. BCH-SV faces skepticism due to centralization risks and lack of broad developer support.
What is a hashing war?
A hashing war occurs when two factions use computational power to mine competing versions of a blockchain after a split. The chain with more hash power typically becomes dominant, while the weaker one risks collapse or irrelevance.
Can both chains coexist?
Technically yes—but economically, only one is likely to retain significant value. Coexistence often leads to fragmented liquidity, reduced security, and confusion among users and merchants.
How should investors prepare?
Investors should secure their BCH holdings in non-custodial wallets before the fork date, monitor exchange policies closely, and avoid speculative trading based on hype alone. Diversification and risk management remain key.
Final Outlook: Fragmentation or Renewal?
The November 15 hard fork represents more than just a technical upgrade—it’s a referendum on the future direction of Bitcoin Cash. Will it evolve with modern innovations (ABC), or revert to an idealized past (SV)?
👉 Learn how top traders analyze blockchain forks for strategic advantage.
While uncertainty remains, current indicators point toward Bitcoin Cash ABC maintaining dominance through broader ecosystem support, stronger development momentum, and favorable market sentiment. However, the risk of short-term chaos—including price swings, exchange suspensions, and network attacks—cannot be ignored.
For users, developers, and investors alike, staying informed, securing assets, and avoiding emotional decisions will be crucial during this pivotal chapter in cryptocurrency history.
Keywords: Bitcoin Cash ABC, Bitcoin Cash SV, hard fork, blockchain split, cryptocurrency news, BCH fork 2025, node implementation, hashing war