The legal status of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum varies significantly across different jurisdictions. However, a recent landmark ruling by the Shanghai No.1 Intermediate People's Court has reinforced the recognition of Bitcoin as protected virtual property under Chinese law—marking a pivotal development for digital asset holders and investors.
This appellate decision, issued on May 6, resolved a cross-border dispute over Bitcoin-related property damage. The court upheld that Bitcoin qualifies as network virtual property, entitled to legal protection. Illegally obtained Bitcoin must be returned in full or compensated at market value if return is not possible.
Judicial Recognition of Cryptocurrency as Property
This is not the first time Chinese courts have acknowledged the property nature of digital currencies. Previously, local courts in Beijing, Shenzhen, Hangzhou, and other major cities have ruled that both Bitcoin and Ethereum constitute legally recognized assets deserving equal protection under civil law.
The Shanghai court based its reasoning on two key grounds:
- Legal Foundation: Article 127 of the General Provisions of the Civil Law of the People’s Republic of China explicitly supports the protection of virtual property in cyberspace.
- Economic Attributes: Acquiring Bitcoin requires substantial investment—both in hardware (high-performance mining equipment) and time. It embodies human labor, can be transferred, and generates economic returns. These characteristics—value, scarcity, and transferability—align with the essential features of a property right.
Thus, the court concluded that Bitcoin meets the criteria for virtual property and possesses the attributes of a tradable digital commodity.
👉 Discover how global markets are embracing digital assets today.
Valuation Challenges in Legal Disputes
One critical aspect of the case involved determining compensation when Bitcoin cannot be physically returned. The court noted that CoinMarketCap.com, while widely used, is not an officially recognized platform in China for pricing virtual currencies. Therefore, its data cannot serve as a standalone basis for calculating damages.
Instead, during the appeal hearing, both parties agreed that if restitution was impossible, each Bitcoin would be valued at 42,206.75 RMB. This mutual agreement highlights a growing trend: even without formal regulatory endorsement, market participants are developing practical methods to assess cryptocurrency value in legal contexts.
Regulatory Context: Not Illegal to Hold, But Not Legal Tender
A common misconception persists among the public—that holding Bitcoin or Ethereum is illegal in mainland China. This belief largely stems from high-profile warnings issued by regulators such as the People's Bank of China (PBC).
However, key documents like:
- Notice on Preventing Bitcoin Risks (2013)
- Announcement on Preventing Risks of Token Issuance Financing (September 4, 2017)
do not prohibit individual ownership of cryptocurrencies. In fact, the 2013 notice explicitly states:
"In nature, Bitcoin should be regarded as a specific type of virtual commodity."
While these guidelines deny Bitcoin the status of legal tender—prohibiting its use as currency in commercial transactions—they stop short of banning possession. As such, individuals are free to engage in cryptocurrency trading as a form of online commodity exchange, provided they bear the associated risks themselves.
The 2017 announcement intensified scrutiny around ICOs (Initial Coin Offerings), but again, it did not criminalize holding Bitcoin or Ethereum. The takeaway? Owning digital assets is not illegal in mainland China—a crucial clarification for investors navigating regulatory gray areas.
Hong Kong’s Evolving Stance on Digital Currencies
In contrast to mainland policies, Hong Kong has taken more progressive steps toward integrating cryptocurrencies into its financial ecosystem.
The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has clarified that Bitcoin and Ethereum are not classified as security tokens, meaning they fall outside the scope of traditional securities regulation. This distinction allows for greater flexibility in their use and trading.
Moreover, real-world adoption is already underway:
- In 2019, home goods retailer Pricerite became the first major retail chain in Hong Kong to accept Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin as payment—converting transactions instantly into HKD.
- Physical stores now exist where customers can exchange fiat currency for digital assets, signaling growing institutional acceptance.
👉 See how professional investors are accessing regulated crypto funds worldwide.
Even more significantly, on April 20 this year, Arrano Capital, the blockchain arm of Venture Smart Asia, launched a new Bitcoin investment fund in Hong Kong. The fund complies with SFC requirements for licensed crypto products and targets $100 million in assets under management within its first year—available exclusively to professional investors.
This development underscores Hong Kong’s ambition to become a regulated hub for digital asset innovation.
Key Takeaways for Investors and Users
Despite differing regulatory approaches across regions, several core principles emerge:
- Bitcoin is legally recognized as property in multiple Chinese jurisdictions.
- Holding cryptocurrency is not illegal in mainland China.
- Market value in disputes must be carefully substantiated—not pulled from unofficial platforms.
- Hong Kong offers a more open environment for crypto usage and investment.
As digital assets continue to mature, legal frameworks will evolve alongside them. For now, understanding your rights—and the distinctions between prohibited uses and permitted ownership—is essential.
👉 Stay ahead with tools designed for secure and compliant digital asset management.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Is Bitcoin legal in China?
A: While Bitcoin cannot be used as legal tender, owning or trading it is not illegal. Chinese courts recognize it as virtual property protected under civil law.
Q: Can I be prosecuted for holding Ethereum in mainland China?
A: No. There is no law that criminalizes personal possession of Ethereum or other cryptocurrencies. However, activities like operating exchanges or conducting ICOs are restricted.
Q: How do Chinese courts determine the value of stolen or lost Bitcoin?
A: Official platforms are preferred for valuation. When unavailable, courts may accept mutually agreed-upon values between parties, as seen in the Shanghai case (42,206.75 RMB per BTC).
Q: Is Hong Kong treating crypto like traditional securities?
A: Not for Bitcoin and Ethereum. The SFC has ruled they are not security tokens and thus aren’t subject to full securities regulation—though investor safeguards still apply.
Q: Can I use Bitcoin to buy goods in Hong Kong?
A: Yes. Retailers like Pricerite accept major cryptocurrencies, converting payments instantly into local currency at market rates.
Q: Are there regulated crypto investment funds in Hong Kong?
A: Yes. Funds like Arrano Capital’s BTC offering are SFC-compliant and available to professional investors—marking a step toward institutional legitimacy.
By clarifying misconceptions and highlighting judicial trends, this case reaffirms that digital assets are increasingly viewed through the lens of property rights, not just technology or finance. As global regulations converge, understanding these legal foundations will be key to responsible participation in the crypto economy.